Assessment 3 – User Flow

Premise:

My interactive’s main user flow is completing the interactive itself. Anything located within the header (“More Info…” & “Find Us”), the “Learn More” button and the interactive features all serve as optional choices, deeming them as alternative user flow routes.

User Flow

Advertisements

Assessment 3 – Prototype Review

Quick Review

Visual Design

Colour Scheme

Annabel: Colours work well, I like the contrast between orange and blue…8/10
Lillian: Colours work well but I would suggest making the arrow brighter or lighter or bigger to make it more visible…8/10

Logo and brand elements

Annabel: Looks corporate very nice…7/10
Lillian: Very professional and suitable for target audience…8/10

Typography: Size, style and layout

Annabel: Typography works well together and suits the design…8/10
Lillian: Typography suits layout body text could be a bit bigger…8/10

Continue reading “Assessment 3 – Prototype Review”

Assessment 2 – Peer Review

Phase 2: The Logo

After receiving feedback from my tutor after Assessment 2, he suggested I try out a variant of the logo that only used one colour. I experimented with logos that used purely orange tones and purely blue tones and found that the blue variant was more attractive. After comparing the monochrome logo with my original logo, I felt as though it was drowned out by the heavy use of blue in my interactive’s colour scheme and decided to stick with the original as the orange helps it pop more.

Aesthetics

Does the colour scheme of the title or logo work?

Continue reading “Assessment 2 – Peer Review”

Assessment 2 – Peer Review

Phase 1: The Interactive

Visual Design

Does the title design engage you?

Lillian: Relates to target audience…8/10
Annabel: Sounds dramatic and intense…7/10

Is the colour scheme of the project appropriate?

Lillian: Relates to ocean context…9/10
Annabel: Complimentary colours – suits context…9/10

Is the name distinctive, recognisable, attributable and memorable?

Lillian: It is not really memorable for your target audience…6/10
Annabel: It’s not really memorable but unique and original…7/10

Continue reading “Assessment 2 – Peer Review”

Assessment 2 – Moodboard/Sitemap/Wireframes

Task Description:

We were tasked with first creating a combined moodboard based on our two user personas, then to sitemap our website/app and lastly, creating wireframes of our key pages within our website/app.

User Personas Moodboard

Moodboard based on my two user personas

The moodboard above is based on my two user personas, the first of the two being a university student studying marine biology and the second being a zoologist. I used images that addressed the personas, their technological approach to the interactive, their locations, their occupation, and the issue they are wanting to learn more about.

Continue reading “Assessment 2 – Moodboard/Sitemap/Wireframes”

Precedent Presentation – Plastic Adrift

Link to site: http://plasticadrift.org/

What is the interactive about?

  • It addresses the issue of plastic litter within the ocean
  • The interactive is about demonstrating where floating debris in the ocean end up over a span of 10 years depending on what part of the ocean you click on

Who is it designed for? (Target Audience)

  • The website is designed for teens – adults as the interface is quite gimmicky while the information provided is in depth, informative and detailed
  • People interested in finding out more about ocean pollution

What knowledge does it assume of the target audience?

  • The colours indicated by the cluster communicate the severity in the amounts of debris (red = large amount / green = light amount)
Continue reading “Precedent Presentation – Plastic Adrift”